
A Dying Man who had been shot was requested by officers of the law to make a statement, and be quick about it.
"You were assaulted without provocation, of course," said the District Attorney, preparing to set down the answer.
"No," replied the Dying Man, "I was the aggressor."
"Yes, I understand," said the District Attorney; "you committed the aggression--you were compelled to, as it were. You did it in self-defence."
"I don't think he would have hurt me if I had let him alone," said the other. "No, I fancy he was a man of peace, and would not have hurt a fly. I brought such a pressure to bear on him that he naturally had to yield--he couldn't hold out. If he had refused to shoot me I don't see how I could decently have continued his acquaintance."
"Good Heavens!" exclaimed the District Attorney, throwing down his note- book and pencil; "this is all quite irregular. I can't make use of such an ante-mortem statement as that."
"I never before knew a man to tell the truth," said the Chief of Police, "when dying of violence."
"Violence nothing!" the Police Surgeon said, pulling out and inspecting the man's tongue--"it is the truth that is killing him."
Police and prosecutors want tidy, convenient statements, and the plain truth is unusable in court.
Advertisement
Discussion questions
- What are the consequences of the Dying Man's honesty in the story?
- How do societal expectations shape individuals' willingness to speak the truth?
- In what ways does the story challenge our understanding of self-defense and aggression?
Advertisement
Read it in another language
- اضطراب قاتل · العربية
- Eine tödliche Störung · Deutsch
- Un Trastorno Fatal · Español
- یک اختلال کشنده · فارسی
- Un trouble fatal · Français
- एक घातक विकार। · हिन्दी
- Un Disturbo Fatale · Italiano
- Um Distúrbio Fatal · Português
- Фатальное расстройство · Русский
- ఒక ప్రాణాంతక రుగ్మత · తెలుగు
- Isang Nakamamatay na Sakit · Tagalog
- Фатальний розлад · Українська
- 一种致命的疾病 · 中文