A Forfeited Right
Story Summary
In "A Forfeited Right," a Thrifty Person sues the Chief of the Weather Bureau after relying on his accurate weather prediction to stock umbrellas that ultimately go unsold. The court rules in favor of the Thrifty Person, highlighting the moral lesson that one can forfeit their right to truthfulness through a history of deception. This classic moral story serves as an inspirational reminder about the importance of integrity and trustworthiness in communication.
Click to reveal the moral of the story
The moral of the story is that a history of dishonesty can undermine one's credibility, making it difficult for others to trust their truthful assertions.
Historical Context
This story reflects a satirical critique of the relationship between individuals and authority, particularly in the realms of prediction and accountability, reminiscent of the folk tale tradition where clever or shrewd characters outwit those in power. Similar themes can be found in Aesop's Fables and other moral tales, where the consequences of human folly and the absurdities of societal norms are highlighted. The narrative echoes the humor found in early 20th-century American literature, which often critiqued bureaucracy and the absurdities of modern life, suggesting a cultural landscape that valued ingenuity and skepticism towards authority.
Our Editors Opinion
This story highlights the contemporary theme of accountability in the face of expert predictions, reminding us that reliance on forecasts—be it in business, weather, or finance—can lead to unforeseen consequences. For instance, a small business owner might stock up on seasonal merchandise based on optimistic sales projections from market analysts, only to find that consumer behavior shifts unexpectedly, leading to significant losses and raising questions about the validity of the forecasts they relied upon.
You May Also Like
The Man with No Enemies
In "The Man with No Enemies," an inoffensive person is brutally assaulted by a stranger, leading to a trial where he claims to have no enemies. The defendant argues that this lack of enemies was the very reason for the attack, prompting the judge to dismiss the case with a humorous yet moral lesson: a person without enemies cannot truly have friends, and thus should not seek justice in court. This short story serves as a thought-provoking moral lesson for students about the complexities of relationships and the nature of conflict.
Three of a Kind
In "Three of a Kind," an inspirational story with a moral, a lawyer driven by a sense of justice defends a burglar who openly admits to having two accomplices—one for protection during the crime and another for legal defense. The lawyer, impressed by the burglar's honesty, ultimately decides to withdraw from the case upon discovering his client's lack of financial means, highlighting themes of integrity and moral choice in this culturally significant tale.
The Stag the Wolf and the Sheep
In "The Stag the Wolf and the Sheep," a Stag seeks a measure of wheat from a Sheep, promising the Wolf as a guarantor. The cautious Sheep declines, fearing both parties' deceit, illustrating the lesson that two dishonest individuals do not create trust. This wisdom-packed moral story teaches young readers that caution is essential when dealing with untrustworthy characters.
Other names for this story
"Truth and Consequence, Weathering the Storm, Umbrella Justice, Forecast Fallout, The Price of Prediction, Accountability in Weather, Legal Umbrella, A Costly Forecast"
Did You Know?
This story illustrates the irony of expecting a forecasted outcome based on a history of unreliable predictions, highlighting themes of accountability and the complexities of trust in authority. It humorously underscores how a reliance on flawed past experiences can lead to misguided decisions, even in seemingly straightforward situations.
Subscribe to Daily Stories
Get a new moral story in your inbox every day.